2015年4月28日星期二

Final project-conflict

Background:
Nowadays, more and more students from mainland will choose to acquire further study in HK because of the high education quality. In the same time, the study styles are different between mainland and HK. One of the example is that students study in HK need to form teams among different courses. Students should finish the course projects or assignments in the form of groups. This way can help students learn from each other and cultivate team spirit of cooperation. However, different team members have different background, different cultures, different personalities and so on.It is inevitable for team members having conflicts.




Scenario:
In the first class of course X, Tom, Sam and Lily happened to seat together. They talked to each other. They found they both come from mainland and had a lot of common interests. When the form of a group, they decided to be the team members.
However, in the second and third class, Lisa didn't come to class. Sam and Lily realized that Tom was not willing to attend classes. He always said he had many other things to do in the class time. But they were a team. They need to finish in class exercises together. Finally, Tom came to class next week. But he didn't want to do presentation. What was worse, he always sticked to his opinions in the group discussions. It was hard for them to achieve a same point. Time passed, they had more and more conflicts. Can they resolve their conflicts and finish the course X successfully?

video address: https://youtu.be/ZyGt_jdNFKc




Methodologies:

Conflict Resolution Modes

Groups’ uses of March and Simon’s [4J modes of conflict resolution (problem-solving, persuasion, bargaining, and politicking), were assessed, again via a constant- sum scale, using an adaptation of nine conflict resolution statements developed by Patchen [5], and Renwick [6]. The statements used were:
1. When differences arose, more information was obtained and/or further analyzed.
2. In group meetings or other interaction, members played down differences and emphasized common points of view. 

3. The decision was reached through negotiations and bargaining.
4.When differences arose, there was a search for an immediate position; a compromise was sought.
5.Problems were brought out into the open and carried out to resolution even though feelings were hurt.
6.One or more individuals used the power of their knowledge to win acceptance of their point of view.
7.A survey of opinion was taken and the majority ruled 
in making the decision.
8.Group politics played a dominant role in the decision 
making.
9.Everyone in the group makes a valuable contribution 
to decisions.




Objective:
We want to solve the common conflicts among team members across different kinds of conflict management.

Reference

Nancy E. Uhring, St. Louis University
David R. Lambert, Case Western Reserve UniversityDevelopments in Business Simulation & Experiential Exercises, Volume 9, 1982

Individual Blogger:
Xiaotian Chen http://jaylxcxt.blogspot.hk
Tianxiao Fu http://tential114.blogspot.hk
Naijia Yao http://2015starrynight.blogspot.hk


2015年4月12日星期日

Assignment 2

Background:


This letter is based on a real story of one of our member, who had a tough time with his/her roommates. Of course we did some modification. But most of the cases in the letter are what really happened. The letter mainly complained about the conflicts between roommates, the feelings of the complainer to his/her roommates and the following measures suggested.

Dear Jim:
  I’m very sorry to have to write you this letter, but you have left me no other choice. I have tried to discuss this issue with you in person, but you always come back home late or you are sleeping in daytime. As such, I have forwarded this letter to you in an attempt to get these issues resolved.
  You always come back home late, usually after 11:00 at night. Sometimes, you even live outside. You have few words with us. When you come back, you will open your computer and play computer games with your friends. You will wear a headphone and talk to your friends. We can hear what you say clearly from our bedrooms. Usually, you will play for about two or three hours, then you will go to sleep. On the second day, you will sleep until midday. Your living room is in a mess. We can see clothes, socks or pants everywhere. You never clean your room.
  You always slam your door with a very loud voice. And you never wash your dishes after dinner. Sometimes you even use my dishes and leave them unwashed so that I have to go out to eat. I remember once, you pushed me to clean the washbasin. After I cleaning the washbasin, I vomited. I told you I didn’t feel well, why didn’t you listen to me? And I even don’t understand why you gave me tens of coins as the electricity fee every time. I got more than 100 coins from you until now.
  As my roommate, I understand that you have an equal right to enjoy the space we live in. However, I really want to tell you that your behaviors bothered me a lot.The voice of your playing computer at midnight and talking to your friends really drives me crazy. Don’t you know that other people were sleeping when you were playing your games? Your voice has seriously disturbed our rest. And I feel really disappointed with your mess living room. Every time I pass your place, I would be stuck by your stuff and I really hate that. I can’t even bring my friends to our home. You should think more about other people, taking others’ feeling into consideration. This is the place where we live together, right?
If you want to use something of other’s, why don’t you ask for other’s consents in the first place? I feel very angry about your using my stuff unauthorized, for I feel not being respected. Only if you respect others can others respect you. We are all from one-child families, I think we need more mutual understanding instead of self-centered. If you want to get a clean room or a clean environment, do not rely on others. You should earn the respect from others by yourself. I guess you want to spend your coins since they are too heavy. But they are also heavy to me! And I cannot give all these coins to people who charge the fee. How can you not consider my feeling? Frankly speaking, I was really pissed off by your selfish behaviors.
   If this situation continues, I have to take measures to solve this problem, since it did affect my living condition. Actually, I need to talk to you and all of us three have to sit together to have a conference. To negotiate how we should act in a proper way. We should list the facts that we did not perform properly and the facts that we cannot give up. By discussion, we may have a clear way to correct ourselves behavior and all of us should take into action. Then our relationship would get better and more furnished.
   Also, there is still one way that I can figure out. In the case of you feel the injustice; you may invite someone as the third party to watch the process. If there is anything that is unfair to you, the person can speak it out for you. We also do not want others to say we two challenge you with power. This conversation will be the most formal between us, which allows us exchange the ideas and repair our relationship. We take it significant to reform the damaged rules and please consider it equally significant as we reckon. Do not miss the last chance to resolve your grievances and set new orders with our willing. We will also appreciate your devotion both in time and effort.
   Or, if you do not spare any effort to do the correction, Jack and I would teach you and give you another chance. If you still do nothing to comfort us, we would no longer show tolerance toward you. Also, if you do not attend the conference, we will no longer be friends or so-called roommates. There is no necessary conversation between us, which we both parties do not want to witness.


Yours Mike

Analysis


About the aims of the letter
I think this class can provide us a good way to express our real feelings and thoughts through this kind of assignment. Although the letter is adapted from a true story, we do not expect the letter would solve the conflict between the team member and his/her roommates. We just want to show the facts that happened and want to express the real feelings. Actually no one can be perfectly objective or possess absolute rationality. We have tried our best to have a fair and objective perspective to tell the story. We hope this letter will cause some thinking on how to communicate with people and how to get along well with people. And we also welcome the follow-up discussion on this problem.


About the writing process
At the beginning we discussed for a long time on how to determine the topic. Then we decided to write a complaint letter for roommates because dormitory conflicts seems to be a very popular topic and some of our team members suffered similar problems. So we thought this topic is a good idea and it aroused our sympathy.

Ladder of inference.
Actually a number of facts are listed in the first part and Mike tried to tell things in a narrative way. But as a matter of fact, Mike might have already been in the ladder of inference because what Mike saw might have been selected in his head. He had his assumptions before and drew a conclusion on Jim, so what he saw is based on the assumptions and conclusions in his head. Since Jim didn't leave a good image on him (few words/back home late), his impression on Jim can’t be good. And what happened next just worsen the image. So ladder of inference will create bad judgement on a person. And that was only one possible situation.

Ladder of inference is a graphically illustration of how Mental model affects people to form conclusions and beliefs. Mental model is first proposed in 1943 by a Scottish psychologist Kenneth Craik. Peter Senge defines it as: deep-rooted presence in people's minds, influence how people understand the world (including ourselves, others, the organization and the world), as well as how to take action based on many assumptions, prejudices, logic, rules, and even images impression, etc.
 
 So the ladder of inference is just a type of manifestations of how your entrenched ideas affect your understanding and reaction. And wrong thoughts will create conflicts to your life and that was what we are trying to avoid. So Jim was deemed to be a person who loves playing games and never taking care of others and somewhat doesn’t respect others.


Lacking Communication
One of the reasons that causes conflicts might be from the ladder of inference, Another one might be from the lacking of communication. As mentioned before, Jim left people an impression of uncommunicative and love playing games, also a little bit mean and dirty. This image can be changed by doing more communication. The thing is they do not even have a chance to talk to each other about the problem, since these people do not have a unified schedule. Jim always comes back home when his roommates are asleep. So conflicts are just like a snowball, keep growing. We strongly believe that if there was enough communication, their relationship wouldn't be that bad. Conflicts are always there. It is just that we can’t make it grow. Huge conflicts finally make Mike burst out. He showed strong feelings of angry and disappointment in the middle of the letter.

Measures to improve the situation


Reflection
Reflection can provide both sides a way to re-examine the issue. Without complaining about others, find the answer from our own. Through reflection, we may find omissions. As old Chinese saying goes:” 静坐常思己过” Sitting quietly, often reflect on your own fault. People always like to see other’s fault first instead of looking inside their own, right? But looking outside, conflicts are more likely to be created. When you look inside, peace and truth are more likely to be created. Actually, there is a term called Vipassana which is from ancient India. Translated into Chinese is“内观“. That is to say, to look inside your heart and somehow you might find out the answer of the truth. You may notice what you ignored and that find out that you might be thoughtless.

Perspective thinking
Seeing things from other’s perspective can
be really helpful in some cases. Just pretend to be Jim and start to analyze the whole thing. Maybe Mike also has done something wrong before. And what he suffered is just Jim’s revenge. Or he didn't notice that his behavior disturbed his roommates because he couldn't hear his own voice by wearing headphones. That sounds like finding excuses for him. But that helps to think out of the box.

Deep communication

In the last part of the letter, we mentioned that a third party can play an important role in improving the communication. The existence of a third party will relieve the tension to some extent. Both sides would get a certain degree of security so that they are willing to create a dialogue. Deep communication is meant to establish common sense, not to create opposition. In the conversation, people will abandon prejudice and use rational thinking and listening to find out real truth that hidden behind things. I guess through this kind of communication, more things will come clear. Some conflicts will be avoided.


Other insights
Resolve conflicts when they are not serious and develop a rule at the very beginning
Do not accumulate conflicts. Most of the time, Chinese people prefer to tolerant others when they feel offended. Then this feeling will grow like a cancer with the time goes by. Just put the problem on the table and speak out the feelings at beginning of the relationship instead of bursting out when it is irremediable.
Develop the rule in the first place so that
everybody would know what is the boundary and which line should not be crossed. Similarly, that’s why the society needs law. People’s behaviors need to be regulated or else conflicts will happen.








Reference:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mental_model